SB 53, the AI protection and transparency invoice that California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into regulation this week, is evidence that state legislation doesn’t need to obstruct AI development.
So says Adam Billen, vp of public coverage at youth-led advocacy workforce Encode AI, on as of late’s episode of Fairness.
“The truth is that coverage makers themselves know that we need to do one thing, and so they know from running on 1,000,000 different problems that there’s a approach to go regulation that really does offer protection to innovation — which I do care about — whilst ensuring that those merchandise are secure,” Billen advised TechCrunch.
At its core, SB 53 is a first-in-the-nation invoice that calls for huge AI labs to be clear about their security and safety protocols – particularly round how they save you their fashions from catastrophic dangers, like getting used to dedicate cyber assaults on crucial infrastructure or construct bio-weapons. The regulation additionally mandates that businesses keep on with the ones protocols, which will likely be enforced through the Administrative center of Emergency Services and products.
“Firms are already doing the stuff that we ask them to do on this invoice,” Billen advised TechCrunch. “They do protection checking out on their fashions. They liberate type playing cards. Are they beginning to skimp in some spaces at some firms? Sure. And that’s why expenses like this are vital.”
Billen additionally famous that some AI companies have a coverage round stress-free protection requirements below aggressive power. OpenAI, for instance, has publicly mentioned that it would possibly “regulate” its protection necessities if a rival AI lab releases a high-risk machine with out identical safeguards. Billen argues that coverage can put into effect firms’ present protection guarantees, fighting them from slicing corners below aggressive or monetary power.
Whilst public opposition to SB 53 used to be muted in comparability to its predecessor SB 1047, which Newsom vetoed remaining 12 months, the rhetoric in Silicon Valley and amongst maximum AI labs has been that virtually any AI legislation is anathema to development and can in the long run obstruct the U.S. in its race to overcome China.
Techcrunch match
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
It’s why firms like Meta, VCs like Andreessen Horowitz, and strong people like OpenAI president Greg Brockman are jointly pumping masses of thousands and thousands into tremendous PACs to again pro-AI politicians in state elections. And it’s why those self same forces previous this 12 months driven for an AI moratorium that may have banned states from regulating AI for 10 years.
Encode AI ran a coalition of greater than 200 organizations to paintings to strike down the proposal, however Billen says the combat isn’t over. Senator Ted Cruz, who championed the moratorium, is making an attempt a brand new technique to reach the similar function of federal preemption of state regulations. In September, Cruz presented the SANDBOX Act, which might permit AI firms to use for waivers to quickly bypass positive federal rules for as much as 10 years. Billen additionally anticipates a coming near near invoice setting up a federal AI usual that may be pitched as a middle-ground answer however would in truth override state regulations.
He warned that narrowly scoped federal AI regulation may just “delete federalism for crucial era of our time.”
“In case you advised me SB 53 used to be the invoice that may substitute the entire state expenses on the whole lot associated with AI and all the attainable dangers, I might let you know that’s most definitely no longer an excellent thought and that this invoice is designed for a selected subset of items,” Billen mentioned.
Whilst he has the same opinion that the AI race with China issues, and that policymakers want to enact legislation that can fortify American development, he says killing state expenses – which basically focal point on deepfakes, transparency, algorithmic discrimination, kids’s protection, and governmental use of AI — isn’t pass about doing that.
“Are expenses like SB 53 the article that can forestall us from beating China? No,” he mentioned. “I feel it is solely really intellectually cheating to mention that that’s the factor that can forestall us within the race.”
He added: “If the article you care about is thrashing China within the race on AI — and I do care about that – then the issues you possibly can push for are stuff like export controls in Congress,” Billen mentioned. “You can make certain that American firms have the chips. However that’s no longer what the business is pushing for.”
Legislative proposals just like the Chip Safety Act intention to stop the diversion of complicated AI chips to China thru export controls and monitoring units, and the prevailing CHIPS and Science Act seeks to spice up home chip manufacturing. Then again, some main tech firms, together with OpenAI and Nvidia, have expressed reluctance or opposition to positive sides of those efforts, mentioning considerations about effectiveness, competitiveness, and safety vulnerabilities.
Nvidia has its causes – it has a robust monetary incentive to proceed promoting chips to China, which has traditionally represented a good portion of its world earnings. Billen speculated that OpenAI may just cling again on chip export advocacy to stick within the just right graces of the most important providers like Nvidia.
There’s additionally been inconsistent messaging from the Trump management. 3 months increasing an export ban on complicated AI chips to China in April 2025, the management reversed path, permitting Nvidia and AMD to promote some chips to China in change for 15% of the earnings.
“You spot other people at the Hill transferring in opposition to expenses just like the Chip Safety Act that may put export controls on China,” Billen mentioned. “Within the period in-between, there’s going to proceed to be this propping up of the narrative to kill state expenses which might be if truth be told reasonably gentle difficult.”
Bilen added that SB 53 is an instance of democracy in motion – of business and policymakers running in combination to get to a model of a invoice that everybody can agree on. It’s “very unsightly and messy,” however “that strategy of democracy and federalism is all the basis of our nation and our financial machine, and I’m hoping that we can stay doing that effectively.”
“I feel SB 53 is without doubt one of the perfect evidence issues that that may nonetheless paintings,” he mentioned.
