NPR’s Juana Summers talks with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, about her new memoir that talks concerning the position she occupies in her birthday party.
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
The remaining 24 hours have introduced various reactions to the U.S. moves on Iranian nuclear amenities. Democrats or even some Republicans have condemned the assault as unconstitutional. They have criticized President Trump for making the transfer with out congressional authorization. One Republican senator supporting the case for the focused moves is Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. She has a name for bucking her birthday party and President Trump on different problems. She’s out with a brand new memoir that talks concerning the position she occupies in her birthday party. Our cohost Juana Summers spoke with Murkowski this morning simply earlier than Iran’s assault on a key U.S. base in Qatar, and Murkowski stated the following 48 to 72 hours can be an important.
JUANA SUMMERS, HOST:
Senator Lisa Murkowski, welcome.
LISA MURKOWSKI: Thanks. Just right to be with you.
SUMMERS: I simply need to get started via asking you on your response to the moves.
MURKOWSKI: Neatly, I feel President Trump made very transparent that his need used to be to barter with Iran, to transport Iran from the aptitude of nuclear guns. That is one thing that no longer is only a need of President Trump. No person on the planet desires Iran to have nuclear guns with, possibly, the exception of Iran. And so the trouble to transport in opposition to some type of negotiated agreement, I feel, used to be vital.
I feel that the management, that President Trump learned, sooner or later, that Iran wasn’t taking this critically. And so he moved in opposition to an excessively decisive motion, very exact objectives in opposition to those 3 websites to take out Iran’s nuclear capacity. I feel it is still observed the level to which the whole thing used to be destroyed. However with the whole thing as contemporary as it’s from this weekend’s information, I feel we are all greater than a little bit bit nervous about, all proper, oh, what comes subsequent?
SUMMERS: You’ve gotten a background in legislation, as you write about to your memoir, and a few of your colleagues on Capitol Hill have challenged the constitutionality of those moves, making the case that they had been performed with out congressional authorization for Congress. What do you assert to them?
MURKOWSKI: So the Conflict Powers Act is particular in the case of the involvement of Congress if the president strikes in opposition to assaults. Nevertheless it offers him, as commander in leader, the authority to enforce focused moves within the tournament of emergency or tournament of danger. Our position in Congress beneath the Conflict Powers Act is then, inside a restricted period of time – excuse me, back off only a 2nd right here – that there can be notification to the Congress inside 48 hours after this sort of assault. After which the Congress has a time frame – 60 days – to weigh in. I feel it’s transparent within the Charter that it’s the Congress that has the authority to claim a warfare. It’s the president, it’s the commander in leader, who then strikes to enforce it.
We are going to have a debate at the flooring of the Senate this week. Senator Tim Kaine has offered a Conflict Powers Answer. Sooner than we transfer on that, we are going to have a possibility for an all-members briefing, a labeled briefing to more or less element extra of the decision-making procedure. And I feel that can be instructive as we transfer ahead on this subsequent procedure as to a possible vote at the Conflict Powers Act.
SUMMERS: Vice President JD Vance says that this doesn’t characterize that the U.S. is at warfare with Iran or its voters, simplest warfare in opposition to its nuclear program. However how involved are you that this transfer may put Americans in peril both within the area or possibly even right here at house?
MURKOWSKI: Neatly, I feel we are all involved, proper? That is about no longer simplest safety for American citizens, it’s safety for our pals in Israel, our pals and allies, as smartly. And so if you have a directed, focused assault like you’ve that optimistically has taken out the nuclear features of a rustic that we have got been pushing to mention prevent for these types of years, you do have to fret about retaliation. What is going to this appear to be? How will it have an effect on us and the danger this is available in the market? And I feel it is been stated via a number of already up to now many hours that those subsequent 48, 72-hour length as we see how Iran will reply can be very, very telling.
Will have to we be involved? Sure, however I feel you will need to put it in context. Iran has been threatening with their endured efforts in opposition to their very own nuclear features for a ways too lengthy. That, in and of itself, is that danger that are meant to purpose all people to fret. Nevertheless it in point of fact is – the president has stated, it in point of fact is in Iran’s fingers as to what comes subsequent. The trail to negotiations continues to be very, very open.
SHAPIRO: And you’ll be able to listen extra of Juana’s dialog with Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski about her new memoir, “A long way From House,” day after today on ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Discuss with our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might range. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right kind mistakes or fit updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or e-newsletter. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
