A large number of research point out that the shift to AI seek options and using AI chatbots are killing site visitors to publishers’ websites. However Google on Wednesday denied that’s the case, a minimum of in mixture. As a substitute, the quest large says that overall natural click on quantity from its seek engine to web pages has been “rather solid” year-over-year and that reasonable click on high quality has rather larger.
“This knowledge is against this to third-party experiences that inaccurately counsel dramatic declines in mixture site visitors — frequently in line with mistaken methodologies, remoted examples, or site visitors adjustments that came about previous to the roll out of AI options in Seek,” writes Google VP and Head of Seek, Liz Reid, in a brand new weblog put up.
Even though Google hasn’t shared any explicit knowledge to again up its conclusions, even though we think Google’s claims to be true, this doesn’t essentially imply that AI isn’t having an have an effect on.
Even Google has to confess this, as Reid recognizes that “person developments are moving site visitors to other websites, leading to lowered site visitors to a few websites and larger site visitors to others.”
That phrase “some” is doing heavy lifting right here, as Google doesn’t proportion knowledge about what number of websites are gaining or shedding. And whilst chatbots like ChatGPT have unquestionably observed site visitors building up in fresh months, that doesn’t imply on-line publishers aren’t struggling.

Google has been revamping its seek engine for years to reply to extra questions without delay at the seek effects web page, and now does so with AI via its “AI Overviews” that seem on the best of seek effects. Google additionally lets in customers to engage with an AI chatbot for some queries. But Google denies that that is considerably reshaping the quest panorama. Moderately, it issues to customers moving their consideration to different websites to start out their queries.
Reid explains, “Persons are more and more in search of out and clicking on websites with boards, movies, podcasts, and posts the place they may be able to pay attention original voices and first-hand views.”
Studying between the traces, it kind of feels like Google.com isn’t essentially other people’s first prevent on the net at the present time. However that’s one thing we’ve recognized for a while. Again in 2022, a Google exec even mentioned that social websites like TikTok and Instagram had been consuming into Google’s core merchandise, like Seek and Maps.
“In our research, one thing like virtually 40% of younger other people, once they’re searching for a spot for lunch, they don’t move to Google Maps or Seek,” mentioned Google SVP Prabhakar Raghavan, who ran the corporate’s Wisdom and Data group on the time (he’s now its Leader Technologist). “They move to TikTok or Instagram,” he famous.
Google has additionally lengthy been nervous that Amazon.com had transform other people’s first prevent for on-line buying groceries searches, and Reddit.com had transform the primary prevent for researching subjects of hobby.
Over a few years, the corporate has attempted to get a hold of compelling options for each shoppers and shops that might draw in extra customers to Google Buying groceries. Those efforts have integrated common buying groceries carts, native stock assessments, deal finders, buying groceries from product photographs on web pages, and extra. It even made its Buying groceries listings loose for traders in 2020.
In the meantime, as customers complained that Google Seek high quality was once declining, the quest large was once seeing such a lot call for for Reddit that it in the end added a “Reddit” clear out to permit customers to slim down effects on related seek queries. (Now that clear out merely reads, “boards.”)
So in all probability there’s some fact in Google’s denials — it’s no longer AI that’s fully answerable for killing seek. Seek was once already loss of life.

Google’s new weblog put up additionally makes an attempt to transport the objective posts somewhat about what it manner for web pages receiving Google’s clicks. Now, as a substitute of counting clicks, it needs publishers to take into accounts click on high quality.
The corporate says reasonable click on high quality has larger, and Google is sending “rather extra high quality clicks” to web pages than a yr in the past. (Google explains {that a} high quality click on is one the place customers don’t temporarily click on again — they keep and browse.) How a lot of an building up, despite the fact that, Google doesn’t say. The corporate handiest issues out that once other people click on via on an AI reaction to the supply, they’re much more likely to dive deeper, so the ones clicks are extra treasured.
What’s extra, Google paints AI as a possibility for internet publishers to achieve larger publicity, announcing that “…with AI Overviews, persons are seeing extra hyperlinks at the web page than sooner than,” as Reid writes. “Extra queries and extra hyperlinks imply extra alternatives for web pages to floor and get clicked.”
However AI, whilst a rising referral supply, isn’t but making up the variation when it comes to clicks, experiences have proven. One fresh find out about from Similarweb signifies that the selection of information searches on the net leading to 0 clicks to information web pages has grown from 56% (when Google introduced AI Overviews in Would possibly 2024) to 69% as of Would possibly 2025.

Google seems to is aware of it is a development, too, because it lately introduced a product for publishers that is helping them monetize their dwindling site visitors in different ways in which don’t depend handiest on promoting, like micropayments or e-newsletter sign-ups.
The truth that Google is pushing this “AI isn’t the top of seek site visitors!” PR now handiest makes the placement appear extra dire. It’s as though Google needs publishers to consider no longer what their very own eyes — and graphs and charts — inform them, however as a substitute take convenience in the truth that Google nonetheless sends “billions of clicks to web pages” on a daily basis, simply because the put up claims.