West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey is amongst 19 Republican governors of states that stand to lose federal Medicaid price range if Congress passes the tax invoice with proposed cuts to this system.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Pictures
disguise caption
toggle caption
Andrew Harnik/Getty Pictures
The final time a Republican-controlled Congress and President Donald Trump moved to slash Medicaid spending, in 2017, a key political power stood of their approach: GOP governors.
Now, as Congress steamrolls towards passing ancient Medicaid cuts of about $1 trillion over 10 years via Trump’s tax and spending regulation, pink state governors are announcing little publicly about what it does to well being care — whilst they face discounts that may punch multibillion-dollar holes of their states’ budgets.
Medicaid, a program collectively run by way of states and the government, covers greater than 70 million low-income or disabled other people, together with just about part of the country’s kids. Republicans say the $900 billion-a-year program used to be allowed to develop too massive underneath Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden by way of including nondisabled adults they are saying do not deserve executive help, and they’ve lengthy sought to scale it again.
One of the vital largest well being cuts within the regulation Trump calls the “One Large Gorgeous Invoice” are completed via new insurance policies that would scale back enrollment by way of enforcing extra bureaucracy calls for on enrollees, together with a demand that many turn out they are operating. The ones insurance policies would impact simplest states that expanded Medicaid to extra low-income other people underneath the Reasonably priced Care Act.
Nineteen of the ones states are led by way of Republican governors. Their silence at the invoice’s well being measures is giving political quilt to GOP lawmakers from their states as they search to chop Medicaid protection for tens of millions of people that received it inside the final decade.
KFF Well being Information contacted all 19 governors for remark at the regulation’s Medicaid cuts. Simplest six replied. Maximum stated they sponsored enforcing a piece requirement on grownup Medicaid enrollees.
“Imposing paintings necessities for able-bodied adults is a great and essential reform in order that Medicaid is getting used for brief help and no longer an enduring entitlement,” stated Drew Galang, a spokesperson for Gov. Patrick Morrisey of West Virginia.
“Governor Rhoden helps body of workers participation as a demand of Medicaid enlargement eligibility,” stated Josie Harms, a spokesperson for South Dakota Gov. Larry Rhoden, including that congressional lawmakers have the governor’s enhance: “South Dakota has a very good federal delegation, and Governor Rhoden trusts them to battle for South Dakota’s priorities whilst handing over on President Trump’s guarantees.”
In an indication of ways the political winds have modified, not one of the governors stated the rest concerning the regulation’s crackdown on every other vital reduce, to supplier taxes — a device that the majority of their states use to lend a hand pay their proportion of Medicaid and acquire further price range from the government. That modify is anticipated to price states billions.
A bipartisan factor not
Against this to the radio silence from GOP governors, Democratic governors have campaigned in opposition to the megabill for weeks.
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro posted at the social media platform X that Trump and congressional Republicans had been deceptive American citizens by way of announcing they had been slicing simplest waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicaid.
“They are speeding to kick masses of hundreds of Pennsylvanians off their healthcare — and mendacity about it,” he posted. “The wear and tear this may do right here in Pennsylvania and throughout The us is staggering and will likely be felt for future years.”
In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul on July 1 charged that Trump’s regulation would devastate hospitals and may result in greater than 34,000 task cuts in her state.
“The collective affect of the GOP reconciliation invoice in Washington, D.C., may power hospitals to curtail significantly wanted products and services akin to maternity care and psychiatric remedy, to not point out to downsize operations, or even shut totally,” she stated in a remark.
In 2017, the refrain used to be bipartisan, as Republican governors in Ohio, Nevada, and Massachusetts spoke out in opposition to slicing Medicaid. Trump’s invoice to repeal a lot of the Reasonably priced Care Act and roll again its Medicaid enlargement narrowly failed within the Senate.
“It is been unexpected that red-state governors, specifically the ones in Medicaid enlargement states, have not spoken out in opposition to Medicaid cuts,” stated Larry Levitt, government vice chairman for well being coverage at KFF, a well being knowledge nonprofit that comes with KFF Well being Information. “Republican governors had been a potent political power within the failed 2017 effort to repeal and substitute the ACA, together with Medicaid enlargement.”
What is modified since 2017, coverage mavens say, is that there are fewer reasonable Republican governors, and GOP state executives who advocated for Medicaid enlargement over a decade in the past are not in workplace.
Moreover, seven of the then-red states that expanded Medicaid did so by the use of poll initiative, most commonly over opposition from their governors.
In reality, the Medicaid paintings requirement is sponsored by way of many Republican governors, although it manner much less federal Medicaid cash and ends up in fewer other people coated.
A number of states, together with Arkansas and Ohio, have already handed state regulations to enforce a demand that adults enrolled underneath the ACA’s Medicaid enlargement paintings, volunteer, move to university, or take part in task coaching. Maximum states have not begun to deliver paintings requirement techniques to fruition as a result of they’re looking forward to federal executive approval.
Charles “Chip” Kahn, president of the Federation of American Hospitals, a business workforce of investor-owned hospitals, stated that whilst fewer governors have engaged publicly in looking to block Medicaid cuts underneath the invoice, federal lawmakers are listening to from legislators of their states.
A political quandary for Republican governors is that, in contrast to in 2017, the invoice prior to Congress isn’t regulation aimed expressly at repealing Obamacare. Its scope is broader than well being care, and would prolong a lot of Trump’s tax cuts, and direct billions in new spending towards border safety, immigration enforcement, and the army, whilst additionally slicing well being care spending.
“It is like taking part in multidimensional chess moderately than specializing in one factor,” Kahn stated.
Larry Jacobs, director of the Middle for the Learn about of Politics and Governance on the College of Minnesota, stated some Republican governors will have expressed issues privately to their states’ GOP senators however don’t seem to be talking out publicly for worry of drawing Trump’s wrath.
“Why are they being cagey? Trump and no longer in need of to be ‘Liz Cheney’d,'” Jacobs stated, relating to the Republican former Wyoming lawmaker whom Trump helped oust after she served as vice chair of an inquiry into his makes an attempt to overturn the result of the 2020 election.
Strolling political tightropes
The political peril Republican lawmakers face in publicly difficult Trump stays particular. On June 29, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) introduced he would no longer run for reelection after he voiced issues concerning the invoice and the president threatened to again a number one challenger. Tillis used to be one in all 3 GOP senators to vote in opposition to it on July 1, despite the fact that it nonetheless narrowly handed.
Along with the paintings requirement, the largest Medicaid cuts within the invoice stem from its restrictions on supplier taxes — levies that states impose on hospitals, nursing properties, and different well being care establishments to lend a hand building up their federal compensation. A lot of the extra cash is then returned to the well being care suppliers within the type of upper bills for his or her Medicaid sufferers.
The apply, which has been followed in each and every state however Alaska, has been criticized by way of some Beltway Republicans as “cash laundering” — even if the taxes are authorized by way of state lawmakers and the federal Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Services and products and feature been allowed underneath federal legislation for many years.
The Senate invoice would restrict the cash states may lift — a transfer that will imply billions in investment cuts to states and their hospitals.
The states with Republican governors that expanded Medicaid are Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Utah.
One of the most governors who expressed issues about repealing the Obamacare Medicaid enlargement in 2017 used to be Jim Justice of West Virginia, a Democrat on the time.
In a June 2017 letter to West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican, Justice wrote: “Since such a lot of of our other people depend on Medicaid, any reduce to Medicaid would smash households in West Virginia.” He added that “the effects can be past catastrophic.”
On July 1, Justice — elected to the Senate as a Republican final 12 months — voted for Trump’s megabill, together with its Medicaid cuts.
“The Senator believes this invoice moves a just right stability between protective probably the most inclined and those that depend at the program whilst rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse to verify this system is administered successfully for the ones deserving,” William O’Grady, a Justice spokesperson, stated in an e mail Wednesday.
KFF Well being Information correspondent Arielle Zionts contributed to this record.
KFF Well being Information is a countrywide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being problems and is likely one of the core running techniques at KFF.
