PUBLISHED
August 17, 2025
KARACHI:
To look forward to a saviour is to inhabit a paradox — the place passivity mask longing, and hope suspends time. This situation resists simple categorisation: it’s neither purely mystical nor wholly political, neither naïve religion nor mere deferral. At its core lies a elementary rigidity between the insufferable provide and an imagined horizon — person who guarantees no longer simply trade, however transformation. This horizon is also divine or secular, collective or intimate, summary or vividly embodied. The determine awaited would possibly by no means arrive; but the act of ready continues to form our desires, outline our silences, and hang-out the thresholds of our turning into.
Walter Benjamin reminds us that “the Messiah comes no longer most effective because the redeemer, he comes because the subduer of Antichrist.” This duality — redeemer and destroyer — unearths the messianic determine as no longer only a bearer of peace, however a drive of ancient rupture. Benjamin additional warns that even “the useless is probably not secure from the enemy if he wins,” insisting that the duty of hope is as a lot about redeeming the previous as expecting the long run. Franz Kafka, together with his paradoxical readability, wrote: “The Messiah will come most effective when he’s not vital… at the very remaining day.” This deferral of arrival mirrors the way in which hope incessantly stays simply past succeed in. But Ernst Bloch outstanding between false hope that enervates and “concretely authentic hope” that fortifies the soul. And possibly Che Guevara captured the moral fee of such hope in its maximum radical shape when he exhorted: “Be practical, call for the unimaginable!”
Such ready, then, isn’t a unique or static enjoy — it emerges from a internet of human wishes, histories, and narratives. Underneath its quite a lot of paperwork lies a layered structure of emotion, ideology, and trust. Those dimensions would possibly vary of their supply or articulation, however they’re all animated by way of the similar inside pain: the craving for any other presence to go into the scene of absence, to change the process what turns out unchangeable.
Mental and existential want
People crave order, redemption, and which means, particularly within the face of struggling or chaos. Looking ahead to a saviour externalises hope — putting the load of answer onto any other imagined presence. This impulse displays a profound existential rigidity: the craving to be rescued as opposed to the phobia of being in the end by myself and answerable for one’s salvation. The eager for an exterior saviour turns into a proxy for confronting inside fragmentation. It’s not simply romanticism however an ontological starvation — a necessity deeply embedded within the very situation of being human.
Political and social serve as
Looking ahead to a redeemer incessantly turns into a device of ideology or keep watch over. It urges inactiveness within the face of injustice, whispering that vary is at all times at the horizon however by no means within the second. Political regimes and establishments have lengthy exploited this impulse, urging electorate to look forward to the revolution, the chief, the following election. The narrative of an drawing close saviour turns into a technique of deferral — pushing justice, reform, or transformation right into a nebulous long term.
On the other hand, this similar ready too can mobilise resistance. The picture of a coming trade sustains hope, fortifies cohesion, and assists in keeping oppressed communities enduring thru ache. In some instances, the determine of the awaited one purposes like a placeholder for collective will, anchoring progressive creativeness. Thus, the messianic turns into double-edged: it may be opium that dulls or oxygen that sustains, relying on how it’s interpreted and held.
Non secular and mythic archetype
The awaited one emerges as a mythic consistent throughout cultures and epochs. From Christ to the Mahdi, Maitreya to Kalki, traditions in all places are haunted by way of the promise of a last redeemer. In line with thinkers like Carl Jung and Mircea Eliade, such figures aren’t simply non secular innovations however archetypes — expressions of the psyche’s deep eager for order, justice, and transcendence.
Those messianic narratives aren’t passive fantasies. They’re packing containers for ethical and metaphysical longing — tales of stability restored, injustice defeated, solidarity regained. On this sense, ready turns into no longer inactiveness however ritualised hope. It’s an embodied narrative construction, enacted in prayer, poetry, and political creativeness alike.
Romanticism, sure — however within the Classical Sense
Within the classical Romantic custom, the act of ready positive factors its personal price. Romanticism privileged longing over fulfilment, the elegant over the rational, the adventure over the vacation spot. On this sense, ready itself turns into significant — no longer simply as a method to an finish, however as a state of heightened awareness.
To attend is to be absolutely found in one’s craving, to recognise the sacred in incompletion. The awaited one turns into much less an answer and extra a replicate, reflecting our private needs. Thus, the romanticism of the awaited determine isn’t naïve, however tragic-hopeful — a method of putting up with and meaning-making.
Fashionable critique
Fashionable philosophers and activists have fastened severe reviews of the saviour complicated. Figures like Frantz Fanon, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Angela Davis have warned in opposition to ready as a type of disempowerment. The chant “we’re the ones we’ve been looking forward to” rejects the deferral of company, insisting that vary will have to emerge from the collective self, no longer an exterior redeemer.
Derrida’s idea of “the messianic with out a messiah” captures this shift. It speaks to a thorough openness towards the long run — a moral readiness to be reworked — with out clinging to the picture of a selected saviour. Right here, the determine of the awaited one dissolves, however the impulse towards justice and alter stays.
The Awaited One in literature
Literature has lengthy been the fireside the place mythic and philosophical flames burn in combination, the place personal longing and public historical past meet within the type of symbol, rhythm, and paradox. The determine of the awaited one — without delay eschatological and existential — reveals one in all its maximum poignant and difficult expressions within the paintings of 2 poets: Forugh Farrokhzad and Jaun Elia. Whilst previous thinkers and poets similar to Iqbal imagined the awaited one as an ethical and religious crucial, Farrokhzad and Elia position the determine beneath the pointy lens of contemporary disillusionment, forging from their distinct poetics two radically divergent reviews of messianic hope.
In Farrokhzad’s poem “Anyone Who Is Now not Like Any person” (kasi keh mesl-e hichkas nist), the awaited one is neither divine nor doctrinal. She frames her whole imaginative and prescient throughout the blameless however understanding eyes of a kid. This kid does no longer look forward to a Mahdi or a Christ however for a determine of intimacy, dignity, and quiet transformation. The poem lists what this awaited one is no longer: he isn’t like the daddy, no longer like Yahya, no longer like the mum. On this sequence of negations, Farrokhzad destabilises conventional relational archetypes, refusing inherited roles.
But what emerges isn’t absence however doable — the awaited one, the poem insists, can do issues nobody else does. He can learn arduous phrases. He can subtract 1000 from twenty million. He can purchase issues on credit score. He can distribute Pepsi and health center numbers. Those banal gestures shimmer with the poet’s genius: Farrokhzad displaces the messianic from the heavens to the road nook. The awaited one is neither supernatural nor victorious — he’s the person who understands techniques, who has get right of entry to, who can navigate bureaucracies and fundamental wishes.
The tone this is progressive in its restraint. There’s no thunderclap of prophecy, no eschaton; as an alternative, there’s delicate insistence. Farrokhzad’s saviour is constructed from the fabrics of this international. The kid’s creativeness isn’t naïve — it’s fiercely exact. Farrokhzad’s awaited one is, in essence, a dream of dignity reconstituted within the aftermath of social trauma. He’s a moral determine who has no miracle to accomplish rather than restoring fractured dailiness. The poem, subsequently, turns into a quiet theological coup: Farrokhzad trades metaphysics for subject matter justice, however keeps the sacred tone of longing.
Thus, Farrokhzad transforms absence into moral creativeness. Her awaited one would possibly by no means arrive in a grand sense, however she desires nevertheless — and thru that dreaming, constructs an international value saving. The tone is delicate but defiant, childlike but visionary. She rejects messianic spectacle, however no longer the proper to wish.
If Farrokhzad’s voice is the quiet reimagining of presence, Jaun Elia’s is the sardonic dirge for presence itself. In one in all his maximum philosophically charged couplets, Elia writes:
Woh jo na āne wālā hai nā, us se mujh ko mat̤lab thā / Āne wāloṅ se kyā mat̤lab — āte haiṅ, āte hoṅge (That one that isn’t going to come back — it was once he that I cared about. / What do I’ve to do with those that come? They arrive; they’re going to come.)
This line encapsulates Elia’s radical anti-messianism. The saviour is significant exactly as a result of he’s absent. The act of ready turns into, in Elia’s arms, a mental theatre of deferral — no longer as a result of we imagine in arrival, however as a result of we want the appearance. The poet exposes a deep reality of the human situation: we connect price to what stays simply out of succeed in. Arrival is banal; it closes the loop. Non-arrival sustains the parable, nourishes want, and preserves the elegant distance between hope and its object.
In contrast to Farrokhzad, whose tone holds ache and risk in one of those luminous suspension, Elia’s tone is irreverent, ironic, and incessantly merciless. His awaited one is a spectre — conjured no longer from trust, however from absence. There’s no tenderness, most effective razor-sharp scepticism. The place Farrokhzad seeks to fix the arena thru re-imagined hope, Elia seeks to unmask it — to turn that our eager for salvation is incessantly a refusal to stand the vacancy of the current.
This isn’t to mention that Elia lacks emotion — to the contrary, his poetry is saturated with loss, disillusionment, and highbrow depression. However he by no means provides this depression the crutch of transcendence. His awaited one by no means comes — and this non-arrival isn’t a sadness, however a metaphysical situation. Elia’s messianic is a vast postponement, a paradoxical confirmation of futility that turns into, unusually, a type of honesty.
Comparative mirrored image: two poetics of longing
Farrokhzad and Elia dramatise two radically other responses to the cave in of conventional messianic trust. Farrokhzad channels this cave in into a brand new ethics of presence — the place ready is infused with care, creativeness, and earthly justice. She holds onto longing no longer as a weak spot however as a thorough act of reconstruction. Her awaited one is reconfigured thru secular compassion.
Elia, in contrast, does no longer reconstruct; he demolishes. He does no longer be offering another saviour — he questions the very grammar of salvation. His tone is that of anyone who has noticed an excessive amount of, who refuses to mislead himself. For Elia, the saviour issues most effective as a result of he by no means arrives. His poetry isn’t about deferred redemption, however concerning the publicity of our dependence on deferral itself.
In combination, those two voices — one Persian, one Urdu; one marked by way of hope, the opposite by way of irony — articulate the dialectic of contemporary ready. Farrokhzad lifts the ruins of theology and builds small altars of kindness. Elia units the ruins ablaze, revealing the absurd structure of longing. Each, of their means, maintain the sacred rigidity between expectation and abandonment.
The Awaited as replicate
The awaited one, as noticed thru those poets, isn’t at all times a divine emissary. Infrequently he’s a projection of our wishes, a critique of the ones wishes. Infrequently, he’s a query we refuse to respond to. In Farrokhzad’s poem, he’s the cushy silhouette of dignity glimpsed throughout the eyes of a war-scarred kid. In Elia’s, he’s the absent cypher of a longing that mocks itself even because it persists.
To attend, then, isn’t at all times to imagine. It may be to consider in a different way, to undergo witness, to snigger, to withstand. The awaited one turns into, after all, no longer a saviour from with out, however a replicate held as much as our maximum continual human situation: the hope that anyone, someplace, will make sense of all of it.
And so, we wait — no longer for the tip, however for the which means solid within the act of ready itself.
Aftab Husain is a Pakistan-born and Austria-based poet in Urdu and English. He teaches South Asian literature and tradition at Vienna College
All info and knowledge are the only real duty of the writer
