Trump’s ordinary declare that he fell out with the indicted kid intercourse trafficker as a result of Epstein “stole” employees from Mar-a-Lago best raises extra lurid questions.

US President Donald Trump speaks all through a bilateral assembly with Britain’s High Minister Keir Starmer on the Trump Turnberry Golfing Classes in Scotland on July 28, 2025.
(Christopher Furlong / POOL / AFP)
Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist, accused of sexual abuse or attack via dozens of ladies. Additionally, he appears to be in critical cognitive decline. That mixture of things virtually promises that the tale of his ties to convicted intercourse perpetrator Jeffrey Epstein, indicted for kid intercourse trafficking ahead of he died in prison, will proceed to unfurl.
Trump gave a protracted, every so often incoherent press convention along British High Minister Keir Starmer on Monday. They had been ostensibly assembly to speak about price lists, however questions veered towards Epstein. As a substitute of slapping them down or ignoring them, as he every so often does, Trump replied them. At period. And really surprisingly.
Trump has maintained that he had a falling out with Epstein years in the past. In 2004, they competed for a similar gaudy Palm Seaside assets, and Trump outbid his pal and were given it. (In some accounts, Epstein used to be the one that broke off the friendship over it.)
Sounds believable, for two scummy wealthy guys.
A few of Trump’s communications other folks say Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago “for being a creep,” within the phrases of henchman Stephen Cheung.
However at Monday’s press convention, Trump gave a distinct rationalization. And a hauntingly creepy one.
“For years I wouldn’t communicate to Jeffrey Epstein, as a result of he did one thing that used to be irrelevant…. He stole those that labored for me.… And he did it once more. So I threw him out of where [Mar-a-Lago]. I’m satisfied I did.”
My first response used to be that “irrelevant” turns out like vulnerable beer to explain Epstein’s 2008 imprisonment for “soliciting and purchasing a minor for prostitution.” However no, Trump wasn’t speaking about that. He clarified: “[Epstein] stole those that labored for me.” Then I recalled that convicted intercourse trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell in reality employed 16-year-old Virginia Giuffre, the daughter of a Mar-a-Lago upkeep supervisor, clear of a task as a spa attendant there. Is that what Trump is considering? And did the pair “scouse borrow” some other Mar-a-Lago employee from Trump?
Remember the fact that Maxwell referred to as the ladies who labored for her “slaves.” Trump additionally gave the impression to have a proprietary passion within the employees of Mar-a-Lago; they weren’t unfastened to pursue different employment—they had been “stolen” assets, corresponding to “slaves” if you’re going to. However Trump’s unforced error goes to spur extra digging via newshounds. (I’m no longer knowledgeable at the loads of women trafficked via Epstein and Maxwell through the years, nevertheless it’s no longer not possible that some other will have additionally been found out running at Mar-a-Lago.) Trump additionally, bizarrely, mentioned he had by no means “had the privilege” of visiting Epstein’s non-public Caribbean island, the place a lot of the intercourse trafficking is claimed to have taken position. What a privilege!
Many years after first seeking to blow the whistle on Epstein and Maxwell (and Prince Andrew, who she alleged compelled her to have intercourse more than one occasions), Virginia Giuffre reportedly dedicated suicide in April of this 12 months (regardless that her folks have puzzled her reason for demise). Her demise is a very powerful reminder that not one of the ladies who raised allegations in opposition to the trafficking pair have got justice.
Trump saved some other facet of the tale alive Monday, when he once more denied contributing a “arguable drawing” of a lady, with allusions to his and Epstein’s many commonalities and “secrets and techniques,” to a e-book for Epstein’s fiftieth birthday. However he did permit that the sort of e-book would possibly exist. “They are saying there have been many letters achieved via many of us,” he instructed newshounds. “Many giant, a success other folks.” He can’t withstand associating himself with the “large a success other folks” who contributed to Epstein’s e-book, will have to the sort of e-book exist—it does, and I are expecting we’ll see it. What’s unsuitable with him?
And within the wake of Deputy Lawyer Normal (and previous Trump non-public protection legal professional) Todd Blanche spending virtually two days speaking to Maxwell, lately serving twenty years in jail for her crimes), Trump blithely insisted, “Smartly, I’m allowed to provide her a pardon however no person’s approached me with it. No person’s requested me about it. Presently it might be irrelevant to discuss it.” Presently, anyway.
Dangerously, that is one position the place Trump’s lapdogs appear just a little frightened about the best way this tale will cross. On Sunday, Space GOP Speaker Mike Johnson, one in every of Trump’s maximum dependable toadies, unloaded concerning the morality and the politics of pardoning Maxwell. It’s value studying in complete:
When you’re asking my opinion, I believe twenty years used to be a pittance. I believe she will have to have a lifestyles sentence a minimum of. Bring to mind these kinds of unspeakable crimes. And as you famous previous, more than likely 1000 sufferers. It’s arduous to place into phrases how evil this used to be and that she orchestrated it and used to be a large a part of it. A minimum of beneath the legal sanction, I believe is an unforgivable factor. So once more, no longer my resolution, however I’ve nice pause about that as any cheap particular person would.
Sure, I see that Johnson is protecting up the lady within the scandal because the “orchestrator,” when proof to that impact is suspect. She’s extra in charge than Epstein? However the remainder of his remark is spot on.
In style
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
It’s all proof of the wicked mindset of elites, whether or not it’s about treating employees, or minor women, as assets. (From which the religious Christian Johnson virtually at all times seems to be away.) It additionally looks like Trump’s proceeding cognitive decline is making it arduous for him, for my part, to reply to or dodge questions successfully. He doesn’t wish to discuss Epstein, but additionally can’t forestall speaking about Epstein. This tale is staying with us.